"Americans rolled over for decades while we gave the executive branch unreviewable authority to kill – now that power is in the hands of an idiot" Truly, I am sorry to any readers who may seem offended by my statement, but so far after just reading that first line, you can tell how bias this article will be and how many opinionated and pathos based statements will be made whilst using very simple syntax and diction. Reading through this article, it becomes clear that the subject is based on Trump's presidency and his decisions made regarding attacks from America. The organization seems very sloppy and simple, not very professional. Intended audience is obviously the citizens of America, especially those who have the power to have an influence on the future of American politics. " Drone strikes have intensified since Donald Trump assumed the presidency. This fact should surprise no one. The ability to kill with a remote control without judicial review was one of the many gifts we bequeathed to Trump prior to his inauguration." The statement just given should support the suspected purpose of trying to convince more and more people of such hatred towards Trump, but I feel as though it does not give enough depth to allow much persuasion. Overall the tone of the article was very simple and quite demanding and very straight to the authors want.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/taibbi-drone-strikes-underscore-how-much-power-we-give-trump-w512658
Analysis by: SYDNEY WINTERS
0 Comments
|
ArchivesCategories |